Dear LCA community,
My research field is packaging sustainabiliy. I just modeled different packaging systems and made the impact assessment with the methods recommended by the European commission (16 PEF impact categories). I used 3 different databases (GaBi, Environmental Footprint DB + ecoinvent3.6) and compared the results.
Ecoinvent results are almost always (much) higher then GaBi results - irrespective of the investigated system, and irrespective of the assessed impact category! Especially Acidification - often +100% compared to GaBi.
I also examined electricity and transport processes. The same thing here.
Take for example 1 kWh of nuclear energy from Germany: Results for "ionising radiation" is 0,3 kBq U235-equivalents for GaBi, but for ecoinvent the result is about 0,6 kBq U235-equivalent. Thats twice as much radiation - for exactly the same technology!!!
I suppose that the modeling philosophy and system boundaries are somehow different, and that in ecoinvent the systems include much more background infrastructure, maintenance work etc than GaBi.
Has anyone made similar experiences? Do you have an explanation?
I am looking forward to your answers. Best regards, Erik