Did the characterisation factors of a specific LCIA method change? Why is the LCIA score of a certain product not the same in the ecoinvent database and in my software tool?
Reasons for changes the characerisation factors
Impact assessment methods are regularly updated to reflect the newest scientific advances, the inclusion of new mechanisms of cause-and-effect, newer data, etc. Ecoinvent uses the results published by method developers to calculate the impacts of the calculated life cycle inventories (LCI).
The implementation of impact assessment methods is not always straightforward and unambiguous. The method developers often calculate characterisation factors (CFs) with assumptions that are not compatible with the results of LCIs.
For example, some methods require precise knowledge of geographical location of an emission to select the appropriate CF.
Other methods ask for information about some properties of the emissions, like water quality. Some methods characterise for example dissipative use of water or materials, when this information is not directly present in the LCI.
Method developers often use different naming conventions than ecoinvent for chemicals, land use and material extraction elementary exchanges. In most cases, CAS number can help, but these are not always present, or for some substances like pesticides, commercial names are ambiguous, contain a mix of active substances and therefore report more than one CAS number.
Some methods do not carry CFs for a substance in all the sub compartments present in ecoinvent. For example, should a chemical emission to groundwater receive the same CF as the same emission to surface water, if the groundwater CF is not explicitly mentioned in the method?
Different actors (method developer, database managers, software developer) might have a different opinion about how to resolve ambiguities.
Finally, plain old human mistakes is bound to happen when managing and aggregating a large quantity of information coming from disparate sources.
Reason for different scores in ecoinvent and the LCA software
For all these reasons, CFs used by ecoinvent sometimes differ from what is found in software. Ecoinvent is not in a position to impose its implementation choices to the other actors in LCA. The actors in the LCA community are mostly divided by their specialisation: inventory and impact assessment. The implementation of impact assessment methods on the inventory sits uncomfortably at the interface of these two specialisations. There is no regulatory body acting as an authority for this particular task.
Transparent implementation
Ecoinvent has started taken the following steps in the direction of greater transparency:
- Better LCIA implementation documentation. The file section of ecoQuery contains a detailed implementation report, showing the source of the CFs and how they were mapped to the ecoinvent elementary exchanges. These reports are reviewed by independent experts or by the method developer.
- Documentation of implementation differences with software. Ecoinvent has started to engage with software developers to minimise those differences. Prior to a release, the implementation is shared to the software and differences are identified. The source of these differences is discussed, and a spreadsheet is available in the file section of ecoQuery for users with a licence.
Where to find the LCIA results and supporting documents
All the documentation and supporting files are available in the files section in the ecoQuery accessible to the users of the database who hold valid ecoinvent licence.
For further information about LCIA implementation, please contact support@ecoinvent.org.
What does the version number of the database mean?
What is an activity in ecoinvent version 3?
What are global background activities and where do they come from?
What is a market and how is it created?
In which situations are direct activity links used?
Why is the reference product of the treatment activities negative?
Why is the amount of the reference product changing?
What is linking and what happens during the linking process? Attributional System Model
What is linking and what happens during the linking process? Consequential System Model
What is allocation at the point of substitution (APOS)?
What do the shortcuts, such as CH, RER, RoW and GLO mean?
The ecoinvent database in Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)
What does it mean, when the production volume of an activity is zero?
Why is the “Allocation, default” system model not available in the ecoquery anymore?
How do I calculate the amount of transport in the market?
What is the Rest-of-the-World (RoW) and how is it calculated?
Why is the LCIA score of a certain product negative?
What are the UUID numbers and how do they work?
How to interpret the uncertainty fields in ecoinvent?
What are the LCIA methods ecoinvent is publishing the impact assessment results for?
APOS: why do I have carrots on my recycled aluminium?